HR 4237 — Stopping Executive Clearance Unfair Revocation Efforts Act
Congress 119 · introduced 2025-06-27
Latest action: — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Sponsors (2)
- Bera, Ami (D, CA-6) — cosponsor
- Jayapal, Pramila (D, WA-7) — cosponsor
Action timeline (3)
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
Text versions (1)
- Introduced in House · 2025-06-27 — open
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
3 typed relationships in the influence graph — 2 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
cosponsor of bill (2)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ← | Bera, Ami | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
| — | ← | Jayapal, Pramila | — | cosponsor | sponsorship |
referred to committee (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-03 | → | House Oversight and Government Reform Committee | — | congress-committee |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jayapal, Pramila (D, house WA-7) | cosponsor | 4 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Bera, Ami (D, house CA-6) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Who's influencing them
Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.
| # | Org | LDA filings | LDA spend | Donor employees | Employee donations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | not employed | 0 | $0 | 860 | $576,588 | $576,588 |
| 2 | self employed | 0 | $0 | 95 | $81,296 | $81,296 |
| 3 | self | 0 | $0 | 44 | $45,490 | $45,490 |
| 4 | none | 0 | $0 | 12 | $18,480 | $18,480 |
| 5 | the commerce company | 0 | $0 | 2 | $14,000 | $14,000 |
| 6 | self-employed | 0 | $0 | 2 | $12,300 | $12,300 |
| 7 | western health advantage | 0 | $0 | 2 | $7,500 | $7,500 |
| 8 | urban elements | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 9 | westbridge | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 10 | alan j preston llc | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 11 | soros fund management | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 12 | law offices of james degel | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 13 | skk developments | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 14 | valve corporation | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 15 | block | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 16 | david skinner | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 17 | fso | 0 | $0 | 1 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| 18 | uc davis | 0 | $0 | 4 | $6,750 | $6,750 |
| 19 | minnesota urology | 0 | $0 | 15 | $6,500 | $6,500 |
| 20 | seattle dept of transportation | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,889 | $5,889 |
| 21 | koreana plaza market oakland inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $5,500 | $5,500 |
| 22 | n/a | 0 | $0 | 11 | $5,000 | $5,000 |
| 23 | fulcrum property group | 0 | $0 | 1 | $4,708 | $4,708 |
| 24 | unisys | 0 | $0 | 1 | $4,300 | $4,300 |
| 25 | top ten toys inc. | 0 | $0 | 1 | $3,800 | $3,800 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
2 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 261 unknown (48%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 2 yes / 0 no / 261 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no
2 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
- Bera, Ami (D · house · CA-6) · cosponsor
- Jayapal, Pramila (D · house · WA-7) · cosponsor
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bera, Ami (cosponsor) · sponsorship
- 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Jayapal, Pramila (cosponsor) · sponsorship
- 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Oversight and Government Reform Committee · congress-committee