SB 3029 — An Act fostering agricultural resilience in Massachusetts
MA 194 session · introduced 2026-03-23
Sponsors (0)
No sponsorships on file.
Action timeline (25)
- · senate — Reported from the committee on Senate Ways and Means
- · senate — Recommended new draft for S2801
- · senate — Order relative to subject matter adopted
- · senate — Placed in the Orders of the Day for Wednesday, April 1, 2026
- · senate — Amendment #3 (Creem) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #4 (Keenan) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #13 (Durant) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #21 (Mark) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #28 (Dooner) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #29 (Montigny) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #31 (Lovely) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #32 (Fattman) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #35 (Fattman) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #40 (Cyr) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #5 (Tarr) adopted -see Roll Call #143 (Yeas 38 to Nays 0)
- · senate — Amendment #7 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #8 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #10 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #14 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #19 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #20 (Mark) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #25 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #30 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #34 (Fattman) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #42 (Tarr) rejected
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no