SB 3072 — S3072
MA 194 session · introduced 2026-04-30
Sponsors (0)
No sponsorships on file.
Action timeline (25)
- · senate — Reported from the committee on Senate Ways and Means
- · senate — Recommended new text for H5316
- · senate — Order relative to subject matter adopted
- · senate — Amendment #6 (Kennedy) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #7 (Gómez) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #11 (Eldridge) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #34 (Gómez) adopted
- · senate — Amendment #36 (Lewis) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #38 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #39 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #40 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #42 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #44 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #46 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #47 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #48 (Keenan) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #54 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #59 (Tarr) rejected -see Roll Call #154 (Yeas 5 to Nays 34)
- · senate — Amendment #60 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #62 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #63 (Tarr) rejected -see Roll Call #155 (Yeas 7 to Nays 32)
- · senate — Amendment #66 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #67 (Fattman) rejected -see Roll Call #156 (Yeas 10 to Nays 29)
- · senate — Amendment #68 (Tarr) rejected
- · senate — Amendment #71 (Tarr) rejected
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no