browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HB 564Pet Cremation and Burial Services - Requirements (Pet Cremation and Burial Services Consumer Protection Act)

MD 2026RS session · introduced 2026-01-28

Establishing certain consumer protection requirements for registered cemeterians, registered cemetery operators, and certain permit holders and licensees that sell or offer for sale pet cremation services for pet remains; establishing the duties of certain persons responsible for returning pet cremains to certain animal owners after cremation; and providing certain penalties for a first violation of the Act, increasing with the second violation, and for a third violation a fine of up to $15,000, and imprisonment of up to 3 years or both.

Latest action: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 547

Sponsors (27)
Action timeline (10)
  1. · house First Reading
  2. · house Hearing — Health
  3. · house Second Reading — Passed with Amendments
  4. · senate First Reading (cross-filed)
  5. · house Third Reading — Passed
  6. · house Committee Report — Favorable with Amendments
  7. · senate Hearing — Finance
  8. · senate Second Reading — Passed with Amendments
  9. · senate Third Reading — Passed with Amendments
  10. · senate Committee Report — Favorable with Amendments
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

referred to committee (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
Senate financemd-leg
House healthmd-leg
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Nick Allen (D, state_lower MD-8)sponsor05
2Aaron M. Kaufman (D, state_lower MD-18)cosponsor01
3Ashanti Martinez (D, state_lower MD-22)cosponsor01
4Bonnie Cullison (D, state_lower MD-19)cosponsor01
5Catherine M. Forbes (D, state_lower MD-43)cosponsor01
6Deni Taveras (D, state_lower MD-47)cosponsor01
7Dylan Behler (D, state_lower MD-30)cosponsor01
8Elizabeth Embry (D, state_lower MD-43)cosponsor01
9Eric Ebersole (D, state_lower MD-44)cosponsor01
10Harry Bhandari (D, state_lower MD-8)cosponsor01
11Heather Bagnall (D, state_lower MD-33)cosponsor01
12Jennifer White Holland (D, state_lower MD-10)cosponsor01
13Jon S. Cardin (D, state_lower MD-11)cosponsor01
14Kim Ross (D, state_lower MD-8)cosponsor01
15Kris Fair (D, state_lower MD-3)cosponsor01
16Lesley J. Lopez (D, state_lower MD-39)cosponsor01
17Mark S. Chang (D, state_lower MD-32)cosponsor01
18Michele Guyton (D, state_lower MD-42)cosponsor01
19Nicholaus R. Kipke (R, state_lower MD-31)cosponsor01
20Pam Lanman Guzzone (D, state_lower MD-13)cosponsor01
21Samuel I. Rosenberg (D, state_lower MD-41)cosponsor01
22Sheila Ruth (D, state_lower MD-44)cosponsor01
23Teresa E. Reilly (R, state_lower MD-35)cosponsor01
24Teresa Woorman (D, state_lower MD-16)cosponsor01
25Terri L. Hill (D, state_lower MD-12)cosponsor01
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-24 · was referred to Senate finance · md-leg
  2. 2026-05-24 · was referred to House health · md-leg
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.