HB 1385 — Health Insurance - Use of Artificial Intelligence - Human Evaluation
MD 2026RS session · introduced 2026-02-13
Requiring that certain audits and compliance reviews of an artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool used for utilization review include a certain evaluation by a licensed health care professional; and requiring that the review and revision of the performance, use, and outcomes of an artificial intelligence, algorithm, or other software tool used for utilization review include a certain human evaluation and use of the findings of the evaluation for a certain purpose.
Latest action: — In the House - Hearing 3/12 at 1:00 p.m.
Sponsors (9)
- Terri L. Hill (D, MD-12) — sponsor · 2026-02-13
- Anne R. Kaiser (D, MD-14) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Gabriel M. Moreno (D, MD-13) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Julie Palakovich Carr (D, MD-17) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Sheila Ruth (D, MD-44) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Matthew J. Schindler (D, MD-2) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Veronica Turner (D, MD-26) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Jennifer White Holland (D, MD-10) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
- Chao Wu (D, MD-9) — cosponsor · 2026-02-13
Action timeline (2)
- · house — First Reading
- · house — Hearing — Health
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
referred to committee (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | House health | — | md-leg |
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Terri L. Hill (D, state_lower MD-12) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Anne R. Kaiser (D, state_lower MD-14) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Chao Wu (D, state_lower MD-9) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Gabriel M. Moreno (D, state_lower MD-13) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Jennifer White Holland (D, state_lower MD-10) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Julie Palakovich Carr (D, state_lower MD-17) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Matthew J. Schindler (D, state_lower MD-2) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 8 | Sheila Ruth (D, state_lower MD-44) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 9 | Veronica Turner (D, state_lower MD-26) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-24 · was referred to House health · md-leg