browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SB 516Law Enforcement - Protective Body Armor - Requirements and Reporting

MD 2026RS session · introduced 2026-02-03

Providing that a law enforcement agency may not assign a law enforcement officer to duties other than administrative duties unless the officer is issued protective body armor; requiring a law enforcement agency to issue only protective body armor that meets certain standards and has not reached an expiration date; prohibiting the Governor's Office of Crime Prevention and Policy from withholding from a law enforcement agency grant funds specifically designated for the purchase of protective body armor; etc.

Latest action: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 461

Sponsors (11)
Action timeline (9)
  1. · senate First Reading
  2. · senate Hearing — Judicial Proceedings
  3. · senate Second Reading — Passed with Amendments
  4. · senate Third Reading — Passed
  5. · house First Reading (cross-filed)
  6. · senate Committee Report — Favorable with Amendments
  7. · house Second Reading — Passed
  8. · house Third Reading — Passed
  9. · house Committee Report — Favorable
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

referred to committee (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
House judiciarymd-leg
Senate judicial proceedingsmd-leg
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Jeff Waldstreicher (D, state_upper MD-18)sponsor05
2C. Anthony Muse (D, state_upper MD-26)cosponsor01
3Charles E. Sydnor (D, state_upper MD-44)cosponsor01
4Chris West (R, state_upper MD-42)cosponsor01
5Mary-Dulany James (D, state_upper MD-34)cosponsor01
6Mike McKay (R, state_upper MD-1)cosponsor01
7Nick Charles (D, state_upper MD-25)cosponsor01
8Sara Love (D, state_upper MD-16)cosponsor01
9Shaneka Henson (D, state_upper MD-30)cosponsor01
10William C. Smith (D, state_upper MD-20)cosponsor01
11William G. Folden (R, state_upper MD-4)cosponsor01
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2026-05-24 · was referred to House judiciary · md-leg
  2. 2026-05-24 · was referred to Senate judicial proceedings · md-leg
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.