HB 891 — House Bill 891 (2025-2026 Session) - North Carolina General Assembly
NC 2025 session · introduced 2025-04-09
Sponsors (6)
- Hugh Blackwell (R, NC-86) — sponsor · 2025-04-09
- Mike Schietzelt (R, NC-35) — sponsor · 2025-04-09
- John M. Blust (R, NC-62) — sponsor · 2025-04-09
- Julia C. Howard (R, NC-77) — sponsor · 2025-04-09
- Donnie Loftis (R, NC-109) — cosponsor · 2025-04-09
- Bill Ward (R, NC-5) — cosponsor · 2025-04-09
Action timeline (5)
- · house — Filed
- · house — Passed 1st Reading
- · house — Ref to the Com on Judiciary 1, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- · house — Reptd Fav Com Substitute
- · house — Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hugh Blackwell (R, state_lower NC-86) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | John M. Blust (R, state_lower NC-62) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 3 | Julia C. Howard (R, state_lower NC-77) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 4 | Mike Schietzelt (R, state_lower NC-35) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 5 | Bill Ward (R, state_lower NC-5) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Donnie Loftis (R, state_lower NC-109) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no