HB 911 — House Bill 911 (2025-2026 Session) - North Carolina General Assembly
NC 2025 session · introduced 2025-04-10
Sponsors (7)
- Sarah Crawford (D, NC-66) — sponsor · 2025-04-10
- Mary Belk (D, NC-88) — cosponsor · 2025-04-10
- Maria Cervania (D, NC-41) — cosponsor · 2025-04-10
- Pricey Harrison (D, NC-61) — cosponsor · 2025-04-10
- Beth Helfrich (D, NC-98) — cosponsor · 2025-04-10
- Monika Johnson-Hostler (D, NC-33) — cosponsor · 2025-04-10
- Brian Turner (D, NC-116) — cosponsor · 2025-04-10
Action timeline (3)
- · house — Filed
- · house — Passed 1st Reading
- · house — Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sarah Crawford (D, state_lower NC-66) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Beth Helfrich (D, state_lower NC-98) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Brian Turner (D, state_lower NC-116) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Maria Cervania (D, state_lower NC-41) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Mary Belk (D, state_lower NC-88) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Monika Johnson-Hostler (D, state_lower NC-33) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 7 | Pricey Harrison (D, state_lower NC-61) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no