browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HB 62Tazewell, Town of; amending charter, residency requirement for town manager.

VA 20261 session

Charter; Town of Tazewell. Amends the charter for the Town of Tazewell in Tazewell County to remove the strict residency requirement for the town manager. The bill provides that the town manager is encouraged to reside within the town limits and may reside within a reasonable distance outside the town limits upon majority approval of town council. This bill is identical to SB 153.

Latest action: Acts of Assembly Chapter

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (28)
  1. · house · H4020
  2. · house · H0701
  3. · house · H0712
  4. · house · H0716
  5. · house · H0705
  6. · house · H4110
  7. · house · H4160
  8. · house · H4009
  9. · house · H4122
  10. · house · H5000
  11. · senate · S4140
  12. · senate · S0701
  13. · senate · S0705
  14. · senate · S4150
  15. · senate · S4145
  16. · senate · S4160
  17. · senate · S4160
  18. · senate · S4130
  19. · senate · S5100
  20. · senate · S5100
  21. · house · H5610
  22. · house · H5601
  23. · house · H5620
  24. · senate · S5620
  25. · house · H7010
  26. · G7010
  27. · G7050
  28. · G9998
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1James W. Morefield (R, state_lower VA)sponsor05
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.