HB 429 — Electric utilities; definitions, integrated resource plans, report.
VA 20261 session
Electric utilities; integrated resource plans. Makes various changes related to the content and process for an integrated resource plan (IRP) developed by an electric utility that provides a forecast of its load obligations and a plan to meet those obligations. The bill (i) extends the planning timeframe from 15 to 20 years; (ii) requires Appalachian Power to file an IRP by removing an exception from the definition of "electric utility"; (iii) changes the frequency with which a utility is required to file an IRP from biennially to triennially; (iv) requires utilities to consider the use of grid-enhancing technologies as alternatives to new transmission infrastructure, and when new transmission lines are envisioned, to provide the reasons grid-enhancing technologies are not sufficient to defer or eliminate the need for new transmission infrastructure; and (v) requires utilities to consider the use of surplus interconnection service, as defined in the bill, to add new electric generation projects and energy storage resources to the grid. The bill requires that the current stakeholder review process for integrated resource plans be facilitated by a third-party facilitator selected by the State Corporation Commission and compensated by the utility. The bill requires, as part of the stakeholder review process, the utility to provide stakeholders with reasonable access to the same modeling software, modeling assumptions, modeling inputs, and data used by the utility to evaluate supply and demand resources in its integrated resource plan to enable stakeholders to create modeling scenarios for the utility's consideration during the development of its integrated resource plan. The bill requires the State Corporation Commission to (a) establish guidelines that ensure that utilities develop comprehensive integrated resource plans and provide meaningful public engagement and maximum transparency during the planning process; (b) conduct a proceeding by July 1, 2027, and at least once every five years thereafter, to identify and review each of its existing orders relevant to integrated resource plans to determine if such orders remain necessary and effective and are not overly burdensome; and (c) convene a work group to make recommendations on the required guidelines. As introduced, this bill was a recommendation of the Commission on Electric Utility Regulation. This bill is identical to SB 249.
Latest action: — Acts of Assembly Chapter
Sponsors (1)
- Destiny LeVere Bolling (D, VA) — sponsor
Action timeline (54)
- · house · H4020 —
- · house · H1401 —
- · house · H1412 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · house · H8120 —
- · house · H1418 —
- · house · H1408 —
- · house · H4640 —
- · house · H4110 —
- · house · H4120 —
- · house · H4410 —
- · house · H4601 —
- · house · H5000 —
- · senate · S4140 —
- · senate · S0201 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · senate · S0208 —
- · senate · S4640 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · senate · S0505 —
- · senate · S4150 —
- · senate · S4145 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S4410 —
- · senate · S4601 —
- · senate · S5022 —
- · house · H5432 —
- · senate · S5520 —
- · senate · S6010 —
- · house · H6012 —
- · house · H6011 —
- · house · H6013 —
- · senate · S6011 —
- · senate · S6013 —
- · senate · S5520 —
- · C6038 —
- · house · H6015 —
- · senate · S6015 —
- · house · H5610 —
- · house · H5601 —
- · senate · S5620 —
- · house · H7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · house · H5620 —
- · house · H7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · G7050 —
- · G7050 —
- · G9998 —
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Destiny LeVere Bolling (D, state_lower VA) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no