HB 727 — Social services, local boards of; appointments, terms of office.
VA 20261 session
Local boards of social services; appointments; terms of office. Changes the limit on consecutive terms of office from two consecutive full terms to three consecutive full terms for appointed members of local boards of social services.
Latest action: — Acts of Assembly Chapter
Sponsors (1)
- Will Davis (R, VA) — sponsor
Action timeline (32)
- · house · H4020 —
- · house · H0701 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · house · H0712 —
- · house · H0714 —
- · house · H2405 —
- · house · H4110 —
- · house · H4122 —
- · house · H5000 —
- · senate · S4140 —
- · senate · S0701 —
- · senate · S0714 —
- · senate · S0905 —
- · senate · S4150 —
- · senate · S4145 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S5100 —
- · house · H5610 —
- · house · H5601 —
- · senate · S5620 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · house · H7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · house · H5620 —
- · house · H7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · G7050 —
- · G7050 —
- · G9998 —
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Will Davis (R, state_lower VA) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no