HB 896 — Substantial Risk Order Training Program; established, delayed effective date, report.
VA 20261 session
Substantial risk orders; Substantial Risk Order Training Program established; annual report. Directs the Department of Criminal Justice Services to establish the Substantial Risk Order Training Program for the purposes of training law-enforcement agencies and other public institutions throughout the Commonwealth to use and implement the substantial risk order law. The bill directs all law-enforcement officers to receive training in the use and implementation of substantial risk orders. The bill requires the programming to provide training regarding proper procedures to follow, the circumstances under which the law can be used, the benefits to public safety from proper use of the law, and the harm that may ensue from the law not being used when lawfully available. The Program also includes efforts to educate the public on and increase awareness of the substantial risk order law. The bill requires the Department to report by November 1 each year to the Secretary of Public Safety and Homeland Security regarding the use of Program funds, details of the content of programming developed, and the effectiveness of the Program in assisting law-enforcement agencies and other public institutions in the use of the substantial risk order law. The bill has a delayed effective date of July 1, 2027. The bill requires the Department of Criminal Justice Services to evaluate all potential funding sources for the Program and submit a report on its findings, including the availability of federal funding, to the Chairs of the Senate Committees on Finance and Appropriations and for Courts of Justice and the House Committees on Appropriations and for Courts of Justice no later than November 1, 2026.
Latest action: — Acts of Assembly Chapter
Sponsors (3)
- Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. (D, VA) — sponsor
- Dan I. Helmer (D, VA) — cosponsor
- Amy J. Laufer (D, VA) — cosponsor
Action timeline (50)
- · house · H4020 —
- · house · H1501 —
- · house · H1512 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · house · H8120 —
- · house · H1517 —
- · house · H1507 —
- · house · H0212 —
- · house · H0216 —
- · house · H0205 —
- · house · H4110 —
- · house · H4120 —
- · house · H4212 —
- · house · H4602 —
- · house · H5000 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · senate · S4140 —
- · senate · S1301 —
- · senate · S1305 —
- · senate · S0508 —
- · senate · S4640 —
- · senate · S4150 —
- · senate · S4145 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4150 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S4130 —
- · senate · S4410 —
- · senate · S4601 —
- · senate · S5022 —
- · house · H5432 —
- · house · H5610 —
- · house · H5601 —
- · senate · S5620 —
- · house · H7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · house · H7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · house · H5620 —
- · house · H7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · house · H8500 —
- · G7050 —
- · G9998 —
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Richard C. "Rip" Sullivan, Jr. (D, state_lower VA) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Amy J. Laufer (D, state_lower VA) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Dan I. Helmer (D, state_lower VA) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no