browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SB 94 — Data centers; site assessment, sound profile of the high energy use facility.

VA 20261 session

Siting of data centers; site assessment; high energy use facility. Provides that, prior to any approval of a rezoning application, special exception application, or special use permit for the siting of a new high energy use facility (HEUF), as defined in the bill, a locality shall require that an applicant perform and submit a site assessment to examine the sound profile of the HEUF on residential units and schools located within 500 feet of the HEUF property boundary. The bill also allows a locality to require that a site assessment examine the effect of the proposed facility on (i) ground and surface water resources, (ii) agricultural resources, (iii) parks, (iv) registered historic sites, and (v) forestland on the HEUF site or immediately contiguous land. The provisions of the bill shall not apply to a site with an existing legislative or administrative approval where an applicant is seeking an expansion or modification of an already existing or approved facility and such expansion does not exceed an additional 100 megawatts or more of electrical power. Finally, the bill provides that its provisions shall not be construed to prohibit, limit, or otherwise supersede existing local zoning authority. This bill incorporates SB 130 and is identical to HB 153.

Latest action: — Acts of Assembly Chapter

Sponsors (2)
Action timeline (66)
  1. · senate · S4020 —
  2. · senate · S0701 —
  3. · senate · S0707 —
  4. · senate · S8122 —
  5. · senate · S4099 —
  6. · senate · S0508 —
  7. · senate · S4640 —
  8. · senate · S4150 —
  9. · senate · S4140 —
  10. · senate · S4160 —
  11. · senate · S4160 —
  12. · senate · S4160 —
  13. · senate · S4120 —
  14. · senate · S4160 —
  15. · senate · S4120 —
  16. · senate · S4160 —
  17. · senate · S4120 —
  18. · senate · S4160 —
  19. · senate · S4120 —
  20. · senate · S4160 —
  21. · senate · S4120 —
  22. · senate · S4212 —
  23. · senate · S4410 —
  24. · senate · S8123 —
  25. · senate · S4278 —
  26. · senate · S4200 —
  27. · senate · S4230 —
  28. · senate · S4230 —
  29. · senate · S4604 —
  30. · senate · S4600 —
  31. · senate · S8123 —
  32. · senate · S4602 —
  33. · senate · S5000 —
  34. · house · H5220 —
  35. · house · H4110 —
  36. · house · H0701 —
  37. · house · H0708 —
  38. · house · H4640 —
  39. · house · H4120 —
  40. · house · H4130 —
  41. · house · H4410 —
  42. · house · H4601 —
  43. · house · H5022 —
  44. · senate · S5432 —
  45. · house · H5520 —
  46. · house · H6010 —
  47. · senate · S6012 —
  48. · senate · S6011 —
  49. · senate · S6013 —
  50. · house · H6011 —
  51. · house · H6013 —
  52. · C6038 —
  53. · C6038 —
  54. · house · H6015 —
  55. · senate · S6015 —
  56. · senate · S5610 —
  57. · senate · S5601 —
  58. · senate · S5620 —
  59. · senate · S7010 —
  60. · G7010 —
  61. · house · H5620 —
  62. · senate · S7010 —
  63. · G7010 —
  64. · G7050 —
  65. · G7050 —
  66. · G9998 —
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Danica A. Roem (D, state_upper VA)sponsor0—5
2Adam P. Ebbin (D, state_upper VA)cosponsor0—1
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.