browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SB 153Tazewell, Town of; amending charter, residency requirement for town manager.

VA 20261 session

Charter; Town of Tazewell. Amends the charter for the Town of Tazewell in Tazewell County to remove the strict residency requirement for the town manager. The bill provides that the town manager is encouraged to reside within the town limits and may reside within a reasonable distance outside the town limits upon majority approval of town council. This bill is identical to HB 62.

Latest action: Acts of Assembly Chapter

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (25)
  1. · senate · S4020
  2. · senate · S0701
  3. · senate · S0705
  4. · senate · S4150
  5. · senate · S4140
  6. · senate · S4160
  7. · senate · S4160
  8. · senate · S4120
  9. · senate · S4600
  10. · senate · S5000
  11. · house · H5220
  12. · house · H4110
  13. · house · H0701
  14. · house · H0705
  15. · house · H4120
  16. · house · H4130
  17. · house · H5100
  18. · senate · S5610
  19. · senate · S5601
  20. · house · H5620
  21. · senate · S5620
  22. · senate · S7010
  23. · G7010
  24. · G7050
  25. · G9998
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1T. Travis Hackworth (R, state_upper VA)sponsor05
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.