browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SB 249Electric utilities; definitions, integrated resource plans, report.

VA 20261 session

Electric utilities; integrated resource plans. Makes various changes related to the content and process for an integrated resource plan (IRP) developed by an electric utility that provides a forecast of its load obligations and a plan to meet those obligations. The bill (i) extends the planning timeframe from 15 to 20 years; (ii) requires Appalachian Power to file an IRP by removing an exception from the definition of "electric utility"; (iii) changes the frequency with which a utility is required to file an IRP from biennially to triennially; (iv) requires utilities to consider the use of grid-enhancing technologies as alternatives to new transmission infrastructure, and when new transmission lines are envisioned, to provide the reasons grid-enhancing technologies are not sufficient to defer or eliminate the need for new transmission infrastructure; and (v) requires utilities to consider the use of surplus interconnection service, as defined in the bill, to add new electric generation projects and energy storage resources to the grid. The bill requires that the current stakeholder review process for integrated resource plans be facilitated by a third-party facilitator selected by the State Corporation Commission and compensated by the utility. The bill requires, as part of the stakeholder review process, the utility to provide stakeholders with reasonable access to the same modeling software, modeling assumptions, modeling inputs, and data used by the utility to evaluate supply and demand resources in its integrated resource plan to enable stakeholders to create modeling scenarios for the utility's consideration during the development of its integrated resource plan. The bill requires the State Corporation Commission to (a) establish guidelines that ensure that utilities develop comprehensive integrated resource plans and provide meaningful public engagement and maximum transparency during the planning process; (b) conduct a proceeding by July 1, 2027, and at least once every five years thereafter, to identify and review each of its existing orders relevant to integrated resource plans to determine if such orders remain necessary and effective and are not overly burdensome; and (c) convene a work group to make recommendations on the required guidelines. As introduced, this bill was a recommendation of the Commission on Electric Utility Regulation. This bill is identical to HB 429.

Latest action: Acts of Assembly Chapter

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (56)
  1. · senate · S4020
  2. · senate · S0201
  3. · senate · S8500
  4. · senate · S8122
  5. · senate · S0208
  6. · senate · S4640
  7. · senate · S4150
  8. · senate · S4140
  9. · senate · S4160
  10. · senate · S4160
  11. · senate · S4120
  12. · senate · S4410
  13. · senate · S4600
  14. · senate · S4601
  15. · senate · S5000
  16. · senate · S8500
  17. · house · H5220
  18. · house · H4110
  19. · house · H1401
  20. · house · H1412
  21. · house · H8120
  22. · house · H1418
  23. · house · H1408
  24. · house · H4640
  25. · house · H4120
  26. · house · H4160
  27. · house · H4130
  28. · house · H4410
  29. · house · H4601
  30. · house · H5022
  31. · senate · S5432
  32. · house · H5520
  33. · house · H6010
  34. · senate · S6012
  35. · senate · S6011
  36. · senate · S6013
  37. · house · H6011
  38. · house · H6013
  39. · senate · S8500
  40. · senate · S6012
  41. · C6038
  42. · house · H6015
  43. · senate · S6015
  44. · senate · S8500
  45. · senate · S5610
  46. · senate · S5601
  47. · senate · S5620
  48. · senate · S7010
  49. · G7010
  50. · house · H5620
  51. · senate · S7010
  52. · G7010
  53. · senate · S8500
  54. · G7050
  55. · G7050
  56. · G9998
Text versions (0)

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Scott A. Surovell (D, state_upper VA)sponsor05
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

Timeline
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.