SB 301 — Exemptions from garnishment; minimum protected account balance, certain benefit payments.
VA 20261 session
Exemptions from garnishment; minimum protected account balance; certain benefit payments; procedure for financial institutions. Requires certain financial institutions to automatically exempt from garnishment (i) a minimum protected account balance, defined in the bill as the combined total of not more than $1,000 in a judgment debtor's account or across multiple accounts in the same financial institution, and (ii) a protected amount of certain benefit payments, defined in the bill, that have been deposited into the account via direct deposit or electronic deposit within the two months immediately preceding the day before a financial institution commences an account review. The bill describes an account review as a process of examining an account of a judgment conducted by a financial institution upon such financial institution's receipt of a garnishment summons to determine if any eligible benefit payments have been deposited within the applicable time period and, if so, to calculate the total sum of such benefit payments and establish the total as a protected amount that shall be automatically exempt from garnishment. The bill provides that such procedure to automatically exempt such funds shall not apply if the debt arises from a child support or spousal support obligation or if an exemption is otherwise prohibited by law. The bill further provides that a judgment debtor is not required to claim nor request a hearing for such automatic exemptions. Finally, the bill makes updates to the relevant provisions governing garnishment proceedings, notices to the garnishee and judgment debtor, and the form of a garnishment summons consistent with the provisions of the bill. This bill is identical to HB 601.
Latest action: — Acts of Assembly Chapter
Sponsors (1)
- Schuyler T. VanValkenburg (D, VA) — sponsor
Action timeline (30)
- · senate · S4020 —
- · senate · S0201 —
- · senate · S0214 —
- · senate · S8122 —
- · senate · S1307 —
- · senate · S4150 —
- · senate · S4140 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4120 —
- · senate · S4212 —
- · senate · S4600 —
- · senate · S4602 —
- · senate · S5000 —
- · house · H5220 —
- · house · H4110 —
- · house · H0801 —
- · house · H0805 —
- · house · H4120 —
- · house · H4130 —
- · house · H5100 —
- · senate · S5610 —
- · senate · S5601 —
- · house · H5620 —
- · senate · S5620 —
- · senate · S7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · G7050 —
- · G7050 —
- · G9998 —
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schuyler T. VanValkenburg (D, state_upper VA) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no