SB 522 — Forest Sustainability Fund; Office of Working Lands Preservation to manage.
VA 20261 session
Office of Working Lands Preservation; powers and duties; Forest Sustainability Fund. Adds management of the Forest Sustainability Fund to the powers and duties of the Office of Working Lands Preservation within the Department of Forestry. This bill is identical to HB 543.
Latest action: — Acts of Assembly Chapter
Sponsors (1)
- Angelia Williams Graves (D, VA) — sponsor
Action timeline (30)
- · senate · S4020 —
- · senate · S0101 —
- · senate · S8500 —
- · senate · S0105 —
- · senate · S4150 —
- · senate · S4140 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4120 —
- · senate · S4600 —
- · senate · S5000 —
- · house · H5220 —
- · house · H4110 —
- · house · H0101 —
- · house · H0105 —
- · house · H4120 —
- · house · H4130 —
- · house · H5100 —
- · house · H4190 —
- · house · H5100 —
- · senate · S5610 —
- · senate · S5601 —
- · senate · S8500 —
- · house · H5620 —
- · senate · S5620 —
- · senate · S7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · G7050 —
- · G9998 —
- · G9998 —
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Angelia Williams Graves (D, state_upper VA) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no