SB 742 — Removal of clutter; cutting of grass; agricultural use exemption; Planning District 19.
VA 20261 session
Removal of clutter; cutting of grass; agricultural use exemption; Planning District 19. Exempts localities located in Planning District 19 from provisions that exclude agricultural land from requirements relating to the removal of clutter and cutting of grass when such land is one acre or less and located in an area that is used for a residential purpose. This bill is identical to HB 1316.
Latest action: — Acts of Assembly Chapter
Sponsors (2)
- Lashrecse D. Aird (D, VA) — sponsor
- Emily M. Jordan (R, VA) — cosponsor
Action timeline (27)
- · senate · S4022 —
- · senate · S0701 —
- · senate · S0705 —
- · senate · S4110 —
- · senate · S4140 —
- · senate · S4150 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4160 —
- · senate · S4120 —
- · senate · S4600 —
- · senate · S5000 —
- · house · H5220 —
- · house · H4110 —
- · house · H0701 —
- · house · H0705 —
- · house · H4120 —
- · house · H4130 —
- · house · H5100 —
- · senate · S5610 —
- · senate · S5601 —
- · house · H5620 —
- · senate · S5620 —
- · senate · S7010 —
- · G7010 —
- · G7050 —
- · G7050 —
- · G9998 —
Text versions (0)
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Who matters on this bill
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lashrecse D. Aird (D, state_upper VA) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Emily M. Jordan (R, state_upper VA) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no