AB 1070 — Residential developments: building standards: review.
Congress · introduced 2026-01-05
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Ward, Christopher M. (D, CA-78) — sponsor
Action timeline
- · 1 — Read first time. To print.
- · 3 — From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and TRANS.
- · 5 — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
- · 30 — Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
- · 316 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
- · 266 — Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
- · 6 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (January 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 8 — From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (January 22).
- · 41 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3834.)
- · 112 — In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
- · 2 — Referred to Com. on HOUSING.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ward, Christopher M. (D, state_lower CA-78) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no