AB 1245 — State contracts: certification process: forced labor and human trafficking.
Congress · introduced 2026-01-22
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
Action timeline
- · 104 — Introduced. To print.
- · 3 — From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
- · 103 — Read first time.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and JUD.
- · 143 — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
- · 316 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
- · 999 — Pending re-refer to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 56.
- · 937 — Re-referred to Coms. on G.O. and L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
- · 7 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 7). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
- · 7 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 22 — Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
- · 23 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- · 41 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3878.)
- · 112 — In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on G.O. and L., P.E. & R.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lowenthal, Josh (D, state_lower CA-69) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Stefani, Catherine (D, state_lower CA-19) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no