AB 1486 — Climate resiliency: research farms: grant program.
Congress · introduced 2026-01-22
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Soria, Esmeralda (D, CA-27) — sponsor
- Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (D, CA-4) — cosponsor
- Hadwick, Heather (R, CA-1) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 104 — Introduced. To print.
- · 3 — From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
- · 103 — Read first time.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and NAT. RES.
- · 11 — From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 26).
- · 21 — Read second time and amended.
- · 30 — Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
- · 7 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 304 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
- · 143 — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
- · 22 — Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
- · 23 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- · 41 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3879.)
- · 112 — In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on ED. and E.Q.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soria, Esmeralda (D, state_lower CA-27) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (D, state_lower CA-4) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Hadwick, Heather (R, state_lower CA-1) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no