AB 1607 — Emergency medical services.
Congress · introduced 2026-03-26
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Soria, Esmeralda (D, CA-27) — cosponsor
- Patterson, Joe (R, CA-5) — cosponsor
- Wallis, Greg (R, CA-47) — cosponsor
- Alanis, Juan (R, CA-22) — cosponsor
- Hadwick, Heather (R, CA-1) — cosponsor
- Krell, Maggy (D, CA-6) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 1 — Read first time. To print.
- · 3 — From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and PUB. S.
- · 11 — From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (March 24).
- · 21 — Read second time and amended.
- · 30 — Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
- · 8 — From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 14).
- · 23 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- · 41 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 1. Page 4726.)
- · 112 — In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and PUB. S.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alanis, Juan (R, state_lower CA-22) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 2 | Hadwick, Heather (R, state_lower CA-1) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Krell, Maggy (D, state_lower CA-6) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Patterson, Joe (R, state_lower CA-5) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Soria, Esmeralda (D, state_lower CA-27) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 6 | Wallis, Greg (R, state_lower CA-47) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no