AB 859 — Civil Procedure: recovery of defense costs.
Congress · introduced 2025-02-19
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Macedo, Alexandra (R, CA-33) — sponsor
Action timeline
- · 1 — Read first time. To print.
- · 3 — From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
- · 2 — Referred to Com. on JUD.
- · 9 — From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 8).
- · 24 — Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
- · 41 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1176.)
- · 112 — In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
- · 7 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 300 — In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
- · 298 — In committee: Held under submission.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Macedo, Alexandra (R, state_lower CA-33) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no