AB 947 — Agriculture: Cannella Environmental Farming Act of 1995.
Congress · introduced 2025-10-03
Latest action: — Secretary of State
Sponsors
Action timeline
- · 1 — Read first time. To print.
- · 3 — From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
- · 2 — Referred to Com. on AGRI.
- · 6 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 304 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
- · 8 — From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).
- · 23 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- · 41 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1866.)
- · 112 — In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
- · 2 — Referred to Com. on AGRI.
- · 6 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 300 — In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
- · 23 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- · 124 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2453.).
- · 63 — In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
- · 77 — Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
- · 80 — Approved by the Governor.
- · 79 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 283, Statutes of 2025.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connolly, Damon (D, state_lower CA-12) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. (D, state_lower CA-4) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no