AB 956 — Accessory dwelling units: ministerial approval: single-family dwellings.
Congress · introduced 2025-03-17
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Quirk-Silva, Sharon (D, CA-67) — sponsor
- Carrillo, Juan (D, CA-39) — cosponsor
- Wicks, Buffy (D, CA-14) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 1 — Read first time. To print.
- · 3 — From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
- · 5 — From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.
- · 30 — Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
- · 143 — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
- · 999 — (Pending re-refer to Com. on L. GOV.)
- · 6 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
- · 6 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 8 — From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (May 14).
- · 23 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- · 41 — Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 4. Page 1654.)
- · 112 — In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
- · 504 — Referred to Coms. on HOUSING and L. GOV.
- · 143 — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quirk-Silva, Sharon (D, state_lower CA-67) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Carrillo, Juan (D, state_lower CA-39) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Wicks, Buffy (D, state_lower CA-14) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no