SB 1159 — Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance.
Congress · introduced 2026-03-25
Latest action: — Assembly
Sponsors
- Cabaldon, Christopher (D, CA-3) — sponsor
- Allen, Benjamin (D, CA-24) — cosponsor
- Jones, Brian W. (R, CA-40) — cosponsor
- Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (R, CA-19) — cosponsor
- Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah (D, CA-39) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 126 — Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
- · 4 — From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
- · 144 — Referred to Coms. on JUD. and P., D.T., & C.P.
- · 124 — Set for hearing March 24.
- · 22 — From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 3659.) (March 24).
- · 37 — Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 6.
- · 850 — Ordered to second reading.
- · 32 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
- · 45 — Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.) Ordered to the Assembly.
- · 56 — In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cabaldon, Christopher (D, state_upper CA-3) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Allen, Benjamin (D, state_upper CA-24) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Jones, Brian W. (R, state_upper CA-40) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Ochoa Bogh, Rosilicie (R, state_upper CA-19) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 5 | Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah (D, state_upper CA-39) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no