SB 1411 — Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: funding conditions: high-speed rail.
Congress · introduced 2026-04-16
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Stern, Henry I. (D, CA-27) — sponsor
- Allen, Benjamin (D, CA-24) — cosponsor
- Durazo, Maria Elena (D, CA-26) — cosponsor
- Gonzalez, Lena A. (D, CA-33) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 1 — Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
- · 3 — Read first time.
- · 144 — Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and E.Q.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 7.
- · 165 — April 7 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 14.
- · 22 — From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 3874.) (April 14).
- · 37 — Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 22.
- · 21 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 4.
- · 343 — May 4 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 14.
- · 149 — May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stern, Henry I. (D, state_upper CA-27) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Allen, Benjamin (D, state_upper CA-24) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Durazo, Maria Elena (D, state_upper CA-26) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Gonzalez, Lena A. (D, state_upper CA-33) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no