pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

SB 390 — Community facilities district: inclusion or annexation of territory: County of San Mateo.

Congress · introduced 2025-10-11

Latest action: — Secretary of State

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · 126 — Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
  2. · 4 — From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.
  3. · 5 — Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
  4. · 124 — Set for hearing May 7.
  5. · 39 — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
  6. · 7 — From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1038.) (May 7).
  7. · 32 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  8. · 45 — Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1242.) Ordered to the Assembly.
  9. · 56 — In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
  10. · 5 — Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
  11. · 7 — From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 18).
  12. · 32 — Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  13. · 851 — Ordered to third reading.
  14. · 61 — Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 2765.) Ordered to the Senate.
  15. · 76 — In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  16. · 77 — Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2443.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  17. · 86 — Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
  18. · 90 — Approved by the Governor.
  19. · 94 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 652, Statutes of 2025.

Text versions

No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Becker, Josh (D, state_upper CA-13)sponsor0—5
2Berman, Marc (D, state_lower CA-23)cosponsor0—1
3Stefani, Catherine (D, state_lower CA-19)cosponsor0—1
4Wiener, Scott D. (D, state_upper CA-11)cosponsor0—1

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.