SB 462 — California Farmland Conservancy Program: conservation easements: funding.
Congress · introduced 2025-04-10
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Cortese, Dave (D, CA-15) — sponsor
- Hurtado, Melissa (D, CA-16) — cosponsor
- Kalra, Ash (D, CA-25) — cosponsor
- Laird, John (D, CA-17) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 126 — Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
- · 4 — From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
- · 5 — Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 8.
- · 39 — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
- · 21 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 707.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 21.
- · 39 — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 343 — April 21 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 23.
- · 149 — May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
- · 128 — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cortese, Dave (D, state_upper CA-15) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Hurtado, Melissa (D, state_upper CA-16) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Kalra, Ash (D, state_lower CA-25) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Laird, John (D, state_upper CA-17) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no