SB 496 — Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation: appeals advisory committee: exemptions.
Congress · introduced 2025-04-07
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Hurtado, Melissa (D, CA-16) — sponsor
- Archuleta, Bob (D, CA-30) — cosponsor
- Niello, Roger W. (R, CA-6) — cosponsor
- Alanis, Juan (R, CA-22) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 126 — Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
- · 4 — From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
- · 144 — Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and TRANS.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 2.
- · 22 — From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 634.) (April 2).
- · 37 — Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 22.
- · 21 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0. Page 843.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 5.
- · 343 — May 5 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 23.
- · 149 — May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
- · 128 — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hurtado, Melissa (D, state_upper CA-16) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Alanis, Juan (R, state_lower CA-22) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Archuleta, Bob (D, state_upper CA-30) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Niello, Roger W. (R, state_upper CA-6) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no