SB 658 — Real property impacted by the 2025 Eaton or Palisades Fires: notification of owner’s intent to sell.
Congress · introduced 2025-04-10
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Pérez, Sasha Renée (D, CA-25) — sponsor
Action timeline
- · 126 — Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
- · 4 — From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
- · 5 — Referred to Com. on RLS.
- · 39 — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
- · 345 — Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 22.
- · 39 — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
- · 951 — Set for hearing April 30 in L. GOV. pending receipt.
- · 21 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 836.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
- · 27 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 969.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 12.
- · 343 — May 12 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 23.
- · 149 — May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
- · 128 — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pérez, Sasha Renée (D, state_upper CA-25) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no