SB 887 — California Environmental Quality Act: environmental leadership development projects: data centers: clean energy powerplant projects.
Congress · introduced 2026-04-09
Latest action: — Senate
Sponsors
- Padilla, Stephen C. (D, CA-18) — sponsor
- Connolly, Damon (D, CA-12) — cosponsor
- Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah (D, CA-39) — cosponsor
- Arreguín, Jesse (D, CA-7) — cosponsor
Action timeline
- · 126 — Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
- · 4 — From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 13.
- · 144 — Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and E., U & C.
- · 124 — Set for hearing March 18.
- · 39 — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
- · 22 — From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on E., U & C. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3600.) (March 18).
- · 37 — Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.
- · 39 — From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 21.
- · 21 — From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 4.
- · 343 — May 4 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
- · 124 — Set for hearing May 14.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Padilla, Stephen C. (D, state_upper CA-18) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Arreguín, Jesse (D, state_upper CA-7) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 3 | Connolly, Damon (D, state_lower CA-12) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
| 4 | Weber Pierson, M.D., Akilah (D, state_upper CA-39) | cosponsor | 0 | — | 1 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no