SJR 4 — Research and education: federal funding cuts: the National Institutes of Health and postsecondary educational institutions.
Congress · introduced 2025-09-09
Latest action: — Secretary of State
Sponsors
- Laird, John (D, CA-17) — sponsor
- Cabaldon, Christopher (D, CA-3) — sponsor
- Limón, Monique (D, CA-21) — sponsor
- Pérez, Sasha Renée (D, CA-25) — sponsor
Action timeline
- · 2 — Introduced. Referred to Com. on RLS.
- · 6 — Re-referred to Com. on ED.
- · 124 — Set for hearing April 30.
- · 14 — From committee: Be adopted. Ordered to third reading. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 962.) (April 30).
- · 47 — Read. Adopted. (Ayes 26. Noes 6. Page 1089.) Ordered to the Assembly.
- · 58 — In Assembly. Held at Desk.
- · 5 — Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
- · 14 — From committee: Be adopted. Ordered to third reading. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 8).
- · 62 — Read. Adopted. (Ayes 61. Noes 9. Page 2862.) Ordered to the Senate.
- · 75 — In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
- · 87 — Enrolled and filed with the Secretary of State at 11:30 a.m.
- · 95 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2025.
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cabaldon, Christopher (D, state_upper CA-3) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 2 | Laird, John (D, state_upper CA-17) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 3 | Limón, Monique (D, state_upper CA-21) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
| 4 | Pérez, Sasha Renée (D, state_upper CA-25) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no