SB 1708 — Veterinary Licensure
Congress · introduced 2026-01-09
Latest action: 2026-03-10 — Laid on Table, refer to HB 1509 -SJ 738
Sponsors
- Gaetz, Don (R, FL-1) — sponsor · 2026-01-09
Action timeline
- · senate — Filed
- · senate — Referred to Regulated Industries; Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; Rules
- · senate — On Committee agenda-- Regulated Industries, 01/27/26, 1:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
- · senate — Introduced
- · senate — Favorable by Regulated Industries; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
- · senate — Now in Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government
- · senate — On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government, 02/12/26, 4:30 pm, 412 Knott Building
- · senate — Favorable by Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
- · senate — Now in Rules
- · senate — On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/24/26, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
- · senate — Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 23 NAYS 0
- · senate — Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
- · senate — Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/06/26
- · senate — Retained on Special Order Calendar -SJ 683
- · senate — Retained on Special Order Calendar -SJ 704
- · senate — Read 2nd time -SJ 738
- · senate — Substituted HB 1509 -SJ 738
- · senate — Laid on Table, refer to HB 1509 -SJ 738
Text versions
No text versions on file yet — same ingest as the action timeline populates these. Each version has direct links to the XML / HTML / PDF at govinfo.gov.
Who matters
Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.
| # | Member | Role | Speeches | Voted | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gaetz, Don (R, state_upper FL-1) | sponsor | 0 | — | 5 |
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no