pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HJRES 104 — Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-07-10

Latest action: — Became Public Law No: 119-48.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
  2. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  4. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  5. · H37100 — On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - 208 (Roll no. 224). (text: CR H3782)
  6. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - 208 (Roll no. 224). (text: CR H3782: 1)
  7. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3819)
  8. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 104, the Chair put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  9. · H35000 — The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  10. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 104.
  11. · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4553, H.J. Res. 104, H.J. Res. 105 and H.J. Res. 106. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4553 under a structured rule, and H.J. Res. 104, H.J. Res. 105, and H.J. Res. 106 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and a motion to recommit on each measure. The resolution further provides that H. Res. 668 and H. Res. 605 are adopted, and H. Res. 598 is laid on the table.
  12. · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 672. (consideration: CR H3782-3787)
  13. · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 672 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4553, H.J. Res. 104, H.J. Res. 105 and H.J. Res. 106. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4553 under a structured rule, and H.J. Res. 104, H.J. Res. 105, and H.J. Res. 106 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and a motion to recommit on each measure. The resolution further provides that H. Res. 668 and H. Res. 605 are adopted, and H. Res. 598 is laid on the table.
  14. — Received in the Senate, read twice.
  15. — Measure laid before Senate by motion.
  16. — Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 47. Record Vote Number: 548.
  17. — Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  18. — Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 47. Record Vote Number: 549.
  19. · 17000 — Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 52 - 47. Record Vote Number: 549.
  20. — Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S6995-7003)
  21. · E20000 — Presented to President.
  22. · 28000 — Presented to President.
  23. · E40000 — Became Public Law No: 119-48.
  24. · 36000 — Became Public Law No: 119-48.
  25. · E30000 — Signed by President.
  26. · 36000 — Signed by President.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (1)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
2025-07-10Downing, Troysponsor_of_bill—sponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Downing, Troy (R, house MT-2)sponsor1—6

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$074$6,400$6,400
2concert croup0$01$3,500$3,500
3sasco0$01$1,000$1,000
4fire tech systems inc.0$01$100$100
5skanska0$01$95$95
6self employed0$02$58$58
7stweart pllc0$01$50$50
8peter amorello const0$01$50$50
9integris0$01$47$47
10centra health0$01$35$35
11bristol myers squibb0$01$22$22
12compassus hospice0$01$14$14

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

311 predicted yes (49%) · 308 predicted no (48%) · 22 unknown (3%)

By party: · R: 310 yes / 1 no / 18 unknown · D: 0 yes / 303 no / 4 unknown · I: 1 yes / 4 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2025-07-10 · sponsored by Downing, Troy (sponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.

Want to partner? Contact us.