HR 1276 — To remove restrictions from a parcel of land in Paducah, Kentucky.
Congress 119 · introduced 2025-02-13
Latest action: — Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Sponsors
No sponsorships on file.
Action timeline
- · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- · Intro-H — Introduced in House
- · 1000 — Introduced in House
- — Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.
- — Subcommittee Hearings Held
- — Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged
- — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
- — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 237.
- · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-281.
- · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-281.
- · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- · H37300 — On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5073)
- · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5073)
- · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1276.
- · H30000 — Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5073-5074)
- · H30300 — Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- — Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Text versions
- Introduced in House · 2025-02-13 — open
- Reported in House · 2025-09-15 — open
- Engrossed in House · 2025-12-09 — open
- Referred in Senate · 2025-12-10 — open
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no