pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 1343ITS Codification Act

Congress 118

Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
  2. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  3. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  4. · 1000 Introduced in House
  5. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 0 .
  6. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  7. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  8. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 49 - 0.
  9. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  10. · H12410 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 26.
  11. · H12200 Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 118-40.
  12. · 5000 Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 118-40.
  13. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  14. · H37300 On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1924)
  15. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H1924)
  16. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1343.
  17. · H30000 Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1924-1925)
  18. · H30300 Mr. Latta moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
  19. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (1)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Lee, Susiecosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Lee, Susie (D, house NV-3)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1not employed0$049$46,430$46,430
2self employed0$011$13,125$13,125
3openai0$02$4,999$4,999
4dragonfly0$01$3,500$3,500
5puma vineyards0$01$3,500$3,500
6not employer0$02$3,400$3,400
7basco0$01$2,500$2,500
8disney0$03$2,250$2,250
9action behavior centers0$01$2,000$2,000
10the voices project0$01$1,500$1,500
11loewy law firm0$01$1,000$1,000
12family management corp.0$01$1,000$1,000
13fox0$01$1,000$1,000
14jcg0$01$1,000$1,000
15jeff kroot architect & assocs0$01$1,000$1,000
16maven0$01$1,000$1,000
17signature partners llc0$01$1,000$1,000
18studio beauty0$01$1,000$1,000
19susan edelstein prod0$01$1,000$1,000
20the corcoran group0$01$1,000$1,000
21covington & burling llp0$01$500$500
22cyberhaven0$01$500$500
23calendar services, inc.0$01$250$250
24cdc management co.0$01$250$250
25cambridge health alliance0$01$200$200

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

1 predicted yes (0%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 262 unknown (48%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 1 yes / 0 no / 262 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Lee, Susie (cosponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.