pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 1631 — Pro Codes Act

Congress 118

Latest action: — On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 248 - 127 (Roll no. 357).

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  4. — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  5. — the motion to favorably report was withdrawn by unanimous consent
  6. — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  7. — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 4.
  8. — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  9. · H37300 — On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 248 - 127 (Roll no. 357).
  10. · 9000 — Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 248 - 127 (Roll no. 357).
  11. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4708)
  12. · H37220 — At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
  13. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1631.
  14. · H30000 — Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4658-4665; text: CR H4658-4660)
  15. · H30300 — Mr. Issa moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
  16. · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 501.
  17. · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-601.
  18. · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-601.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (8)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
—Bishop, Dancosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Kiley, Kevincosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—LaLota, Nickcosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Neguse, Joecosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Nehls, Troy E.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Yakym, Rudycosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Bentz, Cliffcosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Fitzgerald, Scottcosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Fitzgerald, Scott (R, house WI-5)cosponsor2—3
2Kiley, Kevin (I, house CA-3)cosponsor1—2
3Bentz, Cliff (R, house OR-2)cosponsor0—1
4Bishop, Dan (R, house NC-8)cosponsor0—1
5LaLota, Nick (R, house NY-1)cosponsor0—1
6Neguse, Joe (D, house CO-2)cosponsor0—1
7Nehls, Troy E. (R, house TX-22)cosponsor0—1
8Yakym, Rudy (R, house IN-2)cosponsor0—1

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$0539$59,178$59,178
2tolunay-wong0$01$13,500$13,500
3blackstone0$01$10,500$10,500
4not employed0$051$7,213$7,213
5cordish companies0$01$7,000$7,000
6essc0$01$6,830$6,830
7travis kisner0$01$6,830$6,830
8o'neill enterprises0$01$3,500$3,500
9heritage construction + materials0$01$3,300$3,300
10harbinger strategies0$02$2,500$2,500
11odin construction solutions0$01$2,330$2,330
12state of california0$02$2,250$2,250
13self0$022$2,016$2,016
14monarch enterprises inc0$02$2,000$2,000
15gci0$01$2,000$2,000
16lsv0$01$1,300$1,300
17mesirow0$01$1,300$1,300
18snell & wilmer0$01$1,000$1,000
19papillon0$01$1,000$1,000
20holland & hart llp0$01$1,000$1,000
21papillion air0$01$1,000$1,000
22brownstein hyatt farber schreck llp0$01$1,000$1,000
23floma0$01$1,000$1,000
24kogovsek & associates0$01$1,000$1,000
25aborn powers0$01$1,000$1,000

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

218 predicted yes (40%) · 114 predicted no (21%) · 211 unknown (39%)

By party: · R: 126 yes / 41 no / 110 unknown · D: 89 yes / 73 no / 101 unknown · I: 3 yes / 0 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Kiley, Kevin (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Yakym, Rudy (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bishop, Dan (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Fitzgerald, Scott (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  5. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Nehls, Troy E. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  6. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by LaLota, Nick (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  7. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bentz, Cliff (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  8. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Neguse, Joe (cosponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.