browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 1861Checkpoint Modernization Act

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-03-05

Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
  2. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  3. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  4. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  5. · 1000 Introduced in House

Text versions

Connected on the graph

3 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 2 outbound, grouped by type.

referred to committee (2)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-01-03House Homeland Security Committeecongress-committee
2025-01-03House Energy and Commerce Committeecongress-committee
sponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-03-05Gonzales, Tonysponsorsponsorship

The full graph

Every typed relationship touching this entity — 3 edges across 2 categories. Grouped by what the connection is; the heaviest few are shown, with a link to the full list.

Committees

Referred to committee 2 edges

Legislation

Sponsored bill 1 edge

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Gonzales, Tony (R, house TX-23)sponsor05

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$0168$171,196$171,196
2self0$034$31,417$31,417
3not employed0$023$29,168$29,168
4setna io0$01$10,500$10,500
5agins interior0$01$10,500$10,500
6black diamond capital0$01$10,500$10,500
7carmel management0$01$10,500$10,500
8tropicana homes0$01$9,700$9,700
9hunt consolidated inc0$01$7,000$7,000
10clermont llc0$01$7,000$7,000
11texas crude energy llc0$01$7,000$7,000
12self employed0$05$7,000$7,000
13regency centera0$01$6,800$6,800
14sagesure0$01$6,600$6,600
15sun capital partners0$01$6,500$6,500
16prism real estate services llc0$01$6,500$6,500
17wt byler co0$01$5,000$5,000
18homemaker0$01$5,000$5,000
19mdc0$01$5,000$5,000
20polunsky beitel green llp0$01$4,700$4,700
21trideum corporation0$02$4,500$4,500
22stevens transport0$01$3,700$3,700
23ahcv0$01$3,500$3,500
24johnson real estate0$01$3,500$3,500
25ceo0$01$3,500$3,500

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)

By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2025-03-05 · sponsored by Gonzales, Tony (sponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Energy and Commerce Committee · congress-committee
  3. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Homeland Security Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.