pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 2270 — Empowering Employer Child and Elder Care Solutions Act

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-03-21

Latest action: — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on H.R. 2270 is postponed.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
  2. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  4. — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 13.
  5. — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  6. · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 359.
  7. · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-413.
  8. · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-413.
  9. · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 988 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2988, H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312 and H.R. 4366. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2988 under a structured rule, and H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312, and H.R. 4366 under a closed rule. The rule provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
  10. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on H.R. 2270 is postponed.
  11. · H36210 — On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 213 (Roll no. 20).
  12. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H693-694)
  13. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 2270, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (PA) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  14. · H8A000 — The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
  15. · H36200 — Ms. Lee (PA) moved to recommit to the Committee on Education and Workforce. (text: CR H684-685)
  16. · H35000 — The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  17. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2270.
  18. · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2988, H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312 and H.R. 4366. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2988 under a structured rule, and H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312, and H.R. 4366 under a closed rule. The rule provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
  19. · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 988. (consideration: CR H681-685; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H681)

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (4)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
—Harris, Markcosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Hinson, Ashleycosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Onder, Robert F.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Moolenaar, John R.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Harris, Mark (R, house NC-8)cosponsor2—3
2Onder, Robert F. (R, house MO-3)cosponsor1—2
3Hinson, Ashley (R, house IA-2)cosponsor0—1
4Moolenaar, John R. (R, house MI-2)cosponsor0—1

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$012$8,391$8,391
2maxwell group, inc.0$01$7,000$7,000
3s-3 group0$01$3,700$3,700
4ascension marketing group0$01$3,500$3,500
5none0$09$2,355$2,355
6brewer-hensley oil company0$01$2,000$2,000
7talentbridge inc0$01$2,000$2,000
8frontier political group0$01$1,600$1,600
9aaftc0$01$1,561$1,561
10self-employed0$03$1,550$1,550
11collision safety consultants0$01$1,100$1,100
12family allergy asthma0$01$1,041$1,041
13hines corporation0$01$1,000$1,000
14sasco0$01$1,000$1,000
15triumph higher education0$01$500$500
16mid-michigan agency, inc.0$01$300$300
17allervie health0$01$260$260
18prc0$01$250$250
19self0$01$250$250
20bank of america0$01$100$100
21paytient0$01$52$52

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

209 predicted yes (38%) · 265 predicted no (49%) · 69 unknown (13%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 212 no / 65 unknown · D: 209 yes / 50 no / 4 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Moolenaar, John R. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Hinson, Ashley (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Onder, Robert F. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Harris, Mark (cosponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.

Want to partner? Contact us.