pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 2470COST of Relocations Act

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-03-27

Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Sponsors

Lobbied by (1)

LDA filings that named this bill in their activity descriptions. The lobbying firm (registrant) is paid by the client to lobby on this and related issues.

FilingPeriodRegistrant (lobbying firm)ClientIncomeMatched
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONH.R. 2470

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
  2. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 Introduced in House

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (6)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Chu, Judycosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Hernández, Pablo Josecosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Cleaver, Emanuelcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Bishop, Sanford D.cosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
Elfreth, Sarahcosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-01NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONlobbies_on_billH.R. 2470lobbying_bill_mention

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Hernández, Pablo Jose (D, house PR)cosponsor34
2Bishop, Sanford D. (D, house GA-2)cosponsor23
3Chu, Judy (D, house CA-28)cosponsor23
4Elfreth, Sarah (D, house MD-3)cosponsor12
5Cleaver, Emanuel (D, house MO-5)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1self0$03$5,500$5,500
2na0$01$3,500$3,500
3thegroup0$01$3,500$3,500
4lihui lo0$02$3,000$3,000
5kathy fowler agency0$01$2,500$2,500
6hargrove crop insurance0$01$2,500$2,500
7not employed0$09$2,498$2,498
8self employed0$05$2,049$2,049
9strategic farm marketing0$01$2,000$2,000
10spacelink usa inc.0$01$1,750$1,750
11rossi roma0$01$1,750$1,750
12yitong investment inc0$01$1,750$1,750
13iw group inc.0$01$1,750$1,750
14the pines resort bass lake.com0$01$1,500$1,500
15tension corp.0$01$1,500$1,500
16retired0$010$1,455$1,455
17n/a0$06$1,375$1,375
18chen's chinese medicine0$01$1,250$1,250
19kabafusion0$01$1,000$1,000
20ansi0$01$1,000$1,000
21donoho insurance group0$02$1,000$1,000
22hospitality fx0$01$1,000$1,000
23maryland state0$01$1,000$1,000
24san gabriel valley water company0$01$750$750
25american health care association0$01$500$500

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

5 predicted yes (1%) · 280 predicted no (52%) · 258 unknown (47%)

By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 5 yes / 0 no / 258 unknown · I: 0 yes / 3 no

5 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Elfreth, Sarah (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bishop, Sanford D. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Cleaver, Emanuel (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  4. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Chu, Judy (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  5. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Hernández, Pablo Jose (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  6. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (h.r. 2470) · lobbying_bill_mention

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.