pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 2654Lifesaving Gear for Police Act of 2025

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-04-03

Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Sponsors

Lobbied by (1)

LDA filings that named this bill in their activity descriptions. The lobbying firm (registrant) is paid by the client to lobby on this and related issues.

FilingPeriodRegistrant (lobbying firm)ClientIncomeMatched
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterLONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLCSERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY$40,000H.R. 2654

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  2. · H11100 Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  3. · Intro-H Introduced in House
  4. · 1000 Introduced in House

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (2)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
Gonzales, Tonycosponsor_of_billcosponsorsponsorship
2026-01-01SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYlobbies_on_billH.R. 2654lobbying_bill_mention

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Gonzales, Tony (R, house TX-23)cosponsor01

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY1$40,0000$0$40,000
2retired0$038$8,323$8,323
3not employed0$03$3,393$3,393
4mb davis group0$01$2,143$2,143
5churchillforge0$01$2,143$2,143
6argent management llc0$01$2,000$2,000
7self0$04$1,900$1,900
8jll0$01$1,000$1,000
9brainfuse0$01$750$750
10dekel capital0$01$750$750
11gerber & co llp0$01$750$750
12hcc service company0$01$500$500
13ausgar0$01$500$500
14pcp0$01$500$500
15commvault systems inc.0$01$500$500
16xxxxxxxxx0$01$250$250
17firebird grove llc0$01$250$250
18loeb & loeb0$01$250$250
19medstar0$01$250$250
20neubert pepe & monteith p. c.0$01$250$250
21optum healthcare0$01$250$250
22pamf0$01$250$250
23self-employed0$01$149$149
24cheap chevrolet0$01$100$100
25advanced land0$01$50$50

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)

By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Gonzales, Tony (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY (h.r. 2654) · lobbying_bill_mention

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.