pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 788 — Stop Settlement Slush Funds Act of 2023

Congress 118

Latest action: — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  4. — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  5. — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 10.
  6. · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 947 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 788, H.J. Res. 98 and S.J. Res. 38. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 788 under a structured rule, with one hour of general debate. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 98 and S.J. Res. 38 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each joint resolution. Also, the resolution provides for a motion to recommit on H.R. 788 and H.J. Res. 98. A motion to commit on S.J. Res. 38.
  7. · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 278.
  8. · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-339.
  9. · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-339.
  10. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  11. · H37100 — On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - 197 (Roll no. 7).
  12. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 211 - 197 (Roll no. 7).
  13. · H36210 — On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 189 - 205 (Roll no. 6).
  14. · H30000 — Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H83-84)
  15. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 788, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Foushee demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  16. · H8A000 — The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
  17. · H36200 — Mrs. Foushee moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H77)
  18. · H8D000 — DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 947, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McCormick amendment No. 1.
  19. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 788.
  20. · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 788, H.J. Res. 98 and S.J. Res. 38. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 788 under a structured rule, with one hour of general debate. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 98 and S.J. Res. 38 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each joint resolution. Also, the resolution provides for a motion to recommit on H.R. 788 and H.J. Res. 98. A motion to commit on S.J. Res. 38.
  21. · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 947. (consideration: CR H71-77; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H71)
  22. — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (3)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
—Bishop, Dancosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Tiffany, Thomas P.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Moolenaar, John R.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Bishop, Dan (R, house NC-8)cosponsor0—1
2Moolenaar, John R. (R, house MI-2)cosponsor0—1
3Tiffany, Thomas P. (R, house WI-7)cosponsor0—1

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1s-3 group0$01$3,700$3,700
2none0$09$2,355$2,355
3hines corporation0$01$1,000$1,000
4self-employed0$02$550$550
5mid-michigan agency, inc.0$01$300$300
6self0$01$250$250
7retired0$01$50$50

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

340 predicted yes (37%) · 427 predicted no (47%) · 142 unknown (16%)

By party: · R: 177 yes / 171 no / 113 unknown · D: 162 yes / 253 no / 29 unknown · I: 1 yes / 3 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Moolenaar, John R. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Bishop, Dan (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Tiffany, Thomas P. (cosponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.