pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HR 8205 — Keeping Violent Offenders Off Our Streets Act

Congress 118

Latest action: — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H11100 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
  2. · Intro-H — Introduced in House
  3. · 1000 — Introduced in House
  4. — Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.
  5. — Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  6. · H1L210 — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1486 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3334, H.R. 8205, H.R. 8790 and H. Res. 1469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3334 and H.R. 8790 under a structured rule and H.R. 8205 and H. Res. 1469 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each measure with one motion to recommit on H.R. 3334, H.R. 8790, and H.R. 8205.
  7. · H12410 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 598.
  8. · H12200 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-704.
  9. · 5000 — Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-704.
  10. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  11. · H37100 — On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 255 - 161 (Roll no. 454). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5772)
  12. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 255 - 161 (Roll no. 454). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5772)
  13. · H36210 — On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 206 - 212 (Roll no. 453).
  14. · H8D000 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8205, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Fitzgerald demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  15. · H8A000 — The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
  16. · H36200 — Mr. Cardenas moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (CR H5775-5776)
  17. · H35000 — The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  18. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8205.
  19. · H8D000 — Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3334, H.R. 8205, H.R. 8790 and H. Res. 1469. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3334 and H.R. 8790 under a structured rule and H.R. 8205 and H. Res. 1469 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on each measure with one motion to recommit on H.R. 3334, H.R. 8790, and H.R. 8205.
  20. · H30000 — Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1486. (consideration: CR H5772-5776, H5803-5804)
  21. — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (3)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
—Tiffany, Thomas P.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
—Nehls, Troy E.cosponsor_of_bill—cosponsorsponsorship
2024-05-01Fitzgerald, Scottsponsor_of_bill—sponsorsponsorship

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Fitzgerald, Scott (R, house WI-5)sponsor2—7
2Nehls, Troy E. (R, house TX-22)cosponsor0—1
3Tiffany, Thomas P. (R, house WI-7)cosponsor0—1

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$07$17,576$17,576
2tolunay-wong0$01$13,500$13,500
3blackstone0$01$10,500$10,500
4travis kisner0$01$6,830$6,830
5essc0$01$6,830$6,830
6o'neill enterprises0$01$3,500$3,500
7harbinger strategies0$02$2,500$2,500
8gci0$01$2,000$2,000
9monarch enterprises inc0$02$2,000$2,000
10lsv0$01$1,300$1,300
11mesirow0$01$1,300$1,300
12ktm construction0$01$1,000$1,000
13self0$01$1,000$1,000
14papillon0$01$1,000$1,000
15papillion air0$01$1,000$1,000
16team hallahan0$01$500$500

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

395 predicted yes (43%) · 411 predicted no (45%) · 109 unknown (12%)

By party: · R: 181 yes / 182 no / 101 unknown · D: 213 yes / 226 no / 8 unknown · I: 1 yes / 3 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Tiffany, Thomas P. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2026-05-17 · cosponsored by Nehls, Troy E. (cosponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2024-05-01 · sponsored by Fitzgerald, Scott (sponsor) · sponsorship

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.

Estimated value: $180/mo per user — but we made it free.