browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 242Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 24) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 75) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Refrigerators, Freezers, and Refrigerator-Freezers"; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1048) to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to strengthen disclosure requirements relating to foreign gifts and contracts, to prohibit contracts between institutions of higher education and certain foreign entities and countries of concern, and for other purposes.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-03-24

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (12)
  1. · H12420 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 12.
  2. · H12700 The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 24 and H.J. Res. 75 under a closed rule, and provides for consideration of H.R. 1048 under a structured rule. Also, the resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each measure.
  3. · H12100 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-38, by Ms. Foxx.
  4. · 1010 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-38, by Ms. Foxx.
  5. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  6. · H37100 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 214 - 207 (Roll no. 76). (text: CR H1232)
  7. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 214 - 207 (Roll no. 76). (text: CR H1232)
  8. · H35000 On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 208 (Roll no. 75).
  9. · H30000 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1239-1241)
  10. · H8D000 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 242, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Neguse demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  11. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 242.
  12. · H30000 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1232-1238)
Text versions (2)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

2 typed relationships in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.

referred to committee (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-01-03House Rules Committeecongress-committee
sponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-03-24Foxx, Virginiasponsorsponsorship
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Foxx, Virginia (R, house NC-5)sponsor16

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1retired0$0110$175,210$175,210
2self-employed0$020$34,050$34,050
3apollo global management0$010$26,600$26,600
4homemaker0$04$18,000$18,000
5page interworks pa0$02$14,000$14,000
6affinity living group0$02$14,000$14,000
7housewife0$05$13,950$13,950
8pinehill capital partners0$02$7,500$7,500
9parkdale mills0$01$7,500$7,500
10ldj global strategies0$01$7,000$7,000
11fox paine & company0$01$7,000$7,000
12carroll investment properties0$01$7,000$7,000
13alliance integrated solutions0$01$7,000$7,000
14captive aire0$01$7,000$7,000
15kotis holdings0$01$7,000$7,000
16lincoln-marti school0$01$7,000$7,000
17clearpath0$01$7,000$7,000
18randy marion automotive0$01$7,000$7,000
19ceo and owner0$01$7,000$7,000
20ici homes0$01$7,000$7,000
21blue owl capital inc.0$01$7,000$7,000
22arnold and porter0$01$7,000$7,000
23dale k cline & co. pllc0$01$7,000$7,000
24247 ranch llc0$01$7,000$7,000
25intervest construction inc.0$01$7,000$7,000
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

5 predicted yes (1%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 274 unknown (50%)

By party: · R: 5 yes / 0 no / 274 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

5 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2025-03-24 · sponsored by Foxx, Virginia (sponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Rules Committee · congress-committee
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.