pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 294Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-04-07

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Lobbied by (1)

LDA filings that named this bill in their activity descriptions. The lobbying firm (registrant) is paid by the client to lobby on this and related issues.

FilingPeriodRegistrant (lobbying firm)ClientIncomeMatched
1st Quarter - Report2026 first_quarterELITE STRATEGIC SERVICESCONSERVATIVES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS$25,000H. Res. 294

Action timeline

  1. · H12420 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
  2. · H12700 The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
  3. · H12100 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.
  4. · 1010 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.
  5. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  6. · H37100 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473: 2)
  7. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473: 2)
  8. · H35000 On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).
  9. · H30000 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
  10. · H8D000 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  11. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
  12. · H30000 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (2)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
2026-01-01CONSERVATIVES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTSlobbies_on_billH. Res. 294lobbying_bill_mention
2025-04-07Foxx, Virginiasponsor_of_billsponsorsponsorship

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
2025-01-03referred_to_committeeHouse Rules Committeecongress-committee

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Foxx, Virginia (R, house NC-5)sponsor05

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1CONSERVATIVES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS1$25,0000$0$25,000
2patterson fan company0$01$3,500$3,500
3sullivan & worcester0$01$2,500$2,500
4retired0$02$1,125$1,125
5geist dunn corporation0$01$1,000$1,000
6greenwich catholic school0$01$25$25

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

5 predicted yes (1%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 274 unknown (50%)

By party: · R: 5 yes / 0 no / 274 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

5 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2026-01-01 · lobbied on by CONSERVATIVES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS (h. res. 294) · lobbying_bill_mention
  2. 2025-04-07 · sponsored by Foxx, Virginia (sponsor) · sponsorship
  3. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Rules Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.