pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 436Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-05-21

Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

No sponsorships on file.

Action timeline

  1. · H8D000 POINT OF ORDER - Mr. McGovern raised a point of order against the provisions of H. Res. 436 on the grounds that the resolution violates section 9(c) of the Congressional Budget Act. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H. Res. 436. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration of the resolution.
  2. · H8D000 By direction of the Committee on Rules, Mrs. Houchin called up H.Res. 436 and asked for its immediate consideration.
  3. · H30000 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2220-2235)
  4. · H12420 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 29.
  5. · H12700 The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1 under a closed rule with two hours of general debate and one motion to recommit.
  6. · H12100 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-113, by Mrs. Houchin.
  7. · 1010 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-113, by Mrs. Houchin.
  8. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  9. · H37100 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 212 (Roll no. 142). (text: CR H2220)
  10. · 8000 Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 212 (Roll no. 142).
  11. · H35000 On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 141).
  12. · H8D000 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 436.
  13. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  14. · H36610 On consideration of the resolution. Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 211 (Roll no. 140).
  15. · H36600 Mr. McGovern moved on consideration of the resolution.
  16. · H8D000 POINT OF ORDER - Mr. McGovern raised a point of order against the provisions of H. Res. 436 on the grounds that the resolution violates section 426(a) of the Congressional Budget Act. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H. Res. 436. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration as the statutory means of disposing of the point of order.
  17. · H38310 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  18. · H36610 On consideration of the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 211 (Roll no. 139).
  19. · H36600 Mr. McGovern moved on consideration of the resolution.

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
2025-01-03referred_to_committeeHouse Rules Committeecongress-committee

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

11 predicted yes (2%) · 548 predicted no (98%) · 2 unknown (0%)

By party: · R: 11 yes / 273 no / 2 unknown · D: 0 yes / 272 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

25 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Rules Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.