pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 566 — Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-07-02

Latest action: — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Sponsors

Action timeline

  1. · H8D000 — DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 566.
  2. · H36610 — On consideration of the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 211 (Roll no. 186).
  3. · H36600 — Mr. McGovern moved On consideration of the resolution.
  4. · H8D000 — POINT OF ORDER - Mr. McGovern raised a point of order against the provisions of H. Res. 566 on the grounds that the resolution violates section 426(a) of the Congressional Budget Act. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H. Res. 566. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration.
  5. · H30000 — Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3039-3059; text: CR H3040)
  6. · H8D000 — By direction of the Committee on Rules, Ms. Foxx called up H.Res. 566 and asked for its immediate consideration.
  7. · H12420 — Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 35.
  8. · H12700 — The resolution makes in order a motion that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 1 and provides for one hour of debate.
  9. · H12100 — The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-179, by Ms. Foxx.
  10. · 1010 — The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-179, by Ms. Foxx.
  11. · H38310 — Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  12. · H37100 — On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 189).
  13. · 8000 — Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 219 - 213 (Roll no. 189).

Text versions

Connected on the graph

Inbound (1)

datefromtypeamountrolesource
2025-07-02Foxx, Virginiasponsor_of_bill—sponsorsponsorship

Outbound (1)

datetypetoamountrolesource
2025-01-03referred_to_committeeHouse Rules Committee—congress-committee

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Foxx, Virginia (R, house NC-5)sponsor0—5

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1patterson fan company0$01$3,500$3,500
2sullivan & worcester0$01$2,500$2,500
3retired0$02$1,125$1,125
4geist dunn corporation0$01$1,000$1,000
5greenwich catholic school0$01$25$25

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

861 predicted yes (47%) · 898 predicted no (49%) · 74 unknown (4%)

By party: · R: 857 yes / 1 no / 73 unknown · D: 0 yes / 895 no / 1 unknown · I: 4 yes / 2 no

50 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor) — showing top 50

Activity

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; click the date to jump to its provenance.

  1. 2025-07-02 · sponsored by Foxx, Virginia (sponsor) · sponsorship
  2. 2025-01-03 · was referred to House Rules Committee · congress-committee

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page. Want to partner? Contact us.

Estimated value: $540/mo per user — but we made it free.