browse Browse

pac.dog pac.dog / Bills

HRES 598Providing for the adoption of the resolution (H. Res. 589) providing for the public release of certain documents, records, and communications related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein.

Congress 119 · introduced 2025-07-21

Latest action: Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 672, H. Res. 598 is laid on the table.

Sponsors (1)
Action timeline (5)
  1. · H12420 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 39.
  2. · H12700 The resolution provides that H.Res. 589 is hereby adopted.
  3. · H12100 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-209, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
  4. · 1010 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-209, by Mr. Scott, Austin.
  5. · H1B000 Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 672, H. Res. 598 is laid on the table.
Text versions (1)
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)

CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.

No CRS reports cite this bill yet.

Connected on the graph

1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 1 inbound, 0 outbound, grouped by type.

sponsor of bill (1)
datedirentityamountrolesource
2025-07-21Scott, Austinsponsorsponsorship
Who matters on this bill

Who matters

Members ranked by combined influence on this bill: role (sponsor 5 / cosponsor 1), capped speech count from the Congressional Record, and recorded-vote engagement.

#MemberRoleSpeechesVotedScore
1Scott, Austin (R, house GA-8)sponsor05

Who's influencing them

Orgs ranked by combined money flow on this bill: LDA filings citing the bill + individual contributions in cycle 2026from donors whose employer matches the org name (Schedule A) to any principal committee in the "who matters" list above.

#OrgLDA filingsLDA spendDonor employeesEmployee donationsTotal
1none0$020$36,000$36,000
2self employed0$026$23,050$23,050
3daniel defense0$02$17,500$17,500
4fickling & company, inc0$01$14,000$14,000
5grid raster inc.0$01$10,500$10,500
6herb realty0$01$7,000$7,000
7hennessy automobile0$01$7,000$7,000
8cross potomac consulting0$01$7,000$7,000
9mclendon acres, inc0$01$5,000$5,000
10united obstetrics and gynecology0$01$3,500$3,500
11lowndes county0$01$3,500$3,500
12howard center for women health0$01$3,500$3,500
13c6 strategies0$01$3,500$3,500
14shilon pecan farms inc0$01$3,500$3,500
15j.a. green & co.0$01$3,300$3,300
16prince automotive0$02$2,750$2,750
17mrs homecare inc.0$01$2,500$2,500
18the langdale company0$01$2,500$2,500
19ashley's business solutions0$01$2,500$2,500
20eleanor crook foundation0$01$2,500$2,500
21h2 capital, inc.0$01$2,500$2,500
22teramore development, llc0$01$2,500$2,500
23parrish construction group0$01$2,500$2,500
24yoss platform0$01$2,500$2,500
25sigma defense0$01$2,286$2,286
Stance (positions taken)

Predicted vote

Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.

1 predicted yes (0%) · 266 predicted no (49%) · 276 unknown (51%)

By party: · R: 1 yes / 0 no / 276 unknown · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no

1 high-confidence positions (voted + sponsor + cosponsor)
Timeline

Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.

  1. 2025-07-21 · sponsored by Scott, Austin (sponsor) · sponsorship
News clips about this bill
Mentioned in /ask threads

pac.dog is a free, independent, non-partisan research tool. Every candidate, committee, bill, vote, member, and nonprofit on this site is mirrored from primary U.S. government sources (FEC, congress.gov, govinfo.gov, IRS) and each state's Secretary of State / election commission — no third-party data vendors, no paywall, no editorial intermediation. Citations to the originating source are on every detail page.