H 626 — Development impact fees
ID 2026 session
H0626 by LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE IMPACT FEES - Amends existing law to revise provisions regarding minimum standards and requirements for development impact fees ordinances.
Sponsors (0)
No sponsorships on file.
Action timeline (8)
- — Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing
- — Reported Printed and Referred to Local Government
- — Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation, Filed for Second Reading
- — Read second time; Filed for Third Reading
- — U.C. to hold place on third reading calendar one legislative day
- — U.C. to hold place on third reading calendar one legislative day
- · senate — Read Third Time in Full - PASSED - 68-1-1 AYES - Alfieri, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Berch, Bingham, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Cayler, Church, Cornilles, Crane(12), Crane(13), Dygert, Egbert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Erickson, Fuhriman, Furniss, Galaviz, Gannon, Garner, Hall(Stone), Handy, Harris, Hawkins, Haws, Healey, Hill, Holtzclaw, Hostetler, Leavitt, Manwaring, Marmon, Mathias, McCann, Mendive, Mickelsen(Athay), Miller, Mitchell, Monks, Nelsen, Palmer, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Price, Rasor, Raybould, Raymond, Redman, Rubel, Sauter, Scott, Shepherd, Shirts, Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Thompson, Vander Woude, Veile, Weber, Wheeler, Wisniewski, Mr. Speaker NAYS - Cheatum Absent - Green Floor Sponsor - Alfieri Title apvd - to Senate
- · house — Received from the House passed; filed for first reading
Bill text (extracted)
Amendments
Congressional Research Service briefs (0)
CRS reports that cite this bill in their relatedMaterials — what Congress was reading on the topic. Click any report for its summary, formats, and bill-citation walk.
No CRS reports cite this bill yet.
Connected on the graph
1 typed relationship in the influence graph — 0 inbound, 1 outbound, grouped by type.
referred to committee (1)
| date | dir | entity | amount | role | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | → | House Local Government | — | id-leg-byline |
Who matters on this bill
Stance (positions taken)
Predicted vote
Aggregated from: actual roll-call votes (when present) → sponsor → cosponsor → party median (predicts YES when ≥25% of the caucus sponsored/cosponsored). Each row labels its confidence tier so you can see why a position was predicted.
0 predicted yes (0%) · 543 predicted no (100%) · 0 unknown (0%)
By party: · R: 0 yes / 277 no · D: 0 yes / 263 no · I: 0 yes / 3 no
Timeline
Every typed-graph event involving this entity, newest first. Each row is one edge in the influence graph; the inline strip under the row shows the counterpart's own context (a bill's latest action, a hearing's chamber + date, a filing's form type + filed date, a clip's source + excerpt) so the timeline reads like a Wikipedia citation rail.
- 2026-05-25 · was referred to House Local Government · id-leg-byline